Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNociar, Marek
dc.contributor.authorPipíška, Tomáš
dc.contributor.authorKrál, Pavel
dc.contributor.authorGrbec, Samo
dc.contributor.authorŠernek, Milan
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-13T01:03:16Z
dc.date.available2025-03-13T01:03:16Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn1930-2126 Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozitar.mendelu.cz/xmlui/handle/20.500.12698/2040
dc.description.abstractDue to climate changes, it is necessary to consider the use of other wood species to replace currently used woods. This work deals with the determination of the shear strength of bonded veneers (eight European wood species: spruce, larch, pine, beech, oak, poplar, birch, and alder) with Silekol(R) 311 melamine-urea-formaldehyde adhesive (MUF) with a variable coverage on the surface of the samples: 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 50, 75, and 100%. The Automated Bonding Evaluation System (ABES) was used to evaluate and compare adhesive bond strengths. The larch, beech, and oak samples exhibited greater single-lap shear strength than the control samples from spruce. There was no statistically significant difference in shear strength regarding the adhesive coverage from 100% to 20% on the surface of the samples, for almost all wood species. The results of the project provide basic information about the bonding strengths with different coverage in the adhesive layer, comparing non-commonly used wood species in wood-based composites such as oriented strand board and particleboard.en
dc.format5672-5684
dc.publisherNorth Carolina State University
dc.relationEC/H2020/952314/Adaption strategies in forestry under global climate change impact/ASFORCLIC
dc.relation.ispartofBioResources
dc.relation.urihttps://www.doi.org/10.15376/biores.19.3.5672-5684
dc.rightsCC BY-NC 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectWood-based panelsen
dc.subjectLap shear strengthen
dc.subjectPercentage of adhesive coverageen
dc.subjectMelamine-urea-formaldehyde adhesiveen
dc.subjectStrand boardsen
dc.subjectAutomated Bonding Evaluation System (ABES)en
dc.titleEffect of the percentage of MUF adhesive coverage on shear strength when bonding different wood speciesen
dc.typeJ_ČLÁNEK
dc.date.updated2025-03-13T01:03:16Z
dc.description.versionOA
local.identifier.doi10.15376/biores.19.3.5672-5684
local.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85199782232
local.identifier.wos001286209000014
local.number3
local.volume19
local.identifier.obd43926800
local.identifier.e-issn1930-2126
dc.project.IDIGA-LDF-22-TP-005
dc.project.IDComprehensive comparison of the underutilized wood species for manufacturing laminated strand lumber
dc.project.ID952314
dc.project.IDAdaption strategies in forestry under global climate change impact (ASFORCLIC)
dc.identifier.orcidNociar, Marek 0000-0003-1571-7568
dc.identifier.orcidPipíška, Tomáš 0000-0001-8096-4376
dc.identifier.orcidKrál, Pavel 0000-0001-7466-5185
local.contributor.affiliationLDF
local.horizonH_2020
dc.relation.funderMSM
dc.relation.funderEU


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY-NC 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC 4.0