Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorJanová, Jitka
dc.contributor.authorBoedeker, Kai
dc.contributor.authorBingham, Logan
dc.contributor.authorKindu, Mengistie
dc.contributor.authorKnoke, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-03T00:03:40Z
dc.date.available2024-07-03T00:03:40Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn1286-4560 Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozitar.mendelu.cz/xmlui/handle/20.500.12698/1911
dc.description.abstractKey message A validation convention can be established for forest management optimization models. It consists of (1) the delivery of face validation, (2) performing at least one other validation technique, and (3) an explicit discussion of how the optimization model fulfills the stated purpose. Validation by potential users or external experts is of high importance.Context Optimization modeling has long assisted the management of forest ecosystems, but the credibility of these models has always been debated with criticisms concerning data quality, failures to include relevant processes in the scope of models, and the inclusion of unrealistic assumptions. Validation is widely considered to be crucial to establishing the credibility of models in general, but how to validate optimization models in particular represents a permanent question generally in operations research.Aims We aim to synthesize practical recommendations for the development of validation frameworks in the optimization modeling for forest management.Methods We selected a sample of 46 studies devoted to optimization models to be applied in practice, analysed the contents with respect to validation, and provided a critical review.Results We (1) clarified the meaning and usage of different validation-related terms that are commonly encountered in the literature, (2) identified and categorised the various methods and frameworks that are used to demonstrate model credibility, and (3) derived organizing principles that helped to suggest improvements in validation frameworks.Conclusions A practical validation convention can be established and we suggest the convention to consist of three stages. By providing structured and consistent information about validation processes, researchers in forest management optimization can better demonstrate the credibility of their work to readers and potential users.en
dc.format19
dc.publisherSpringer France
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Forest Science
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-024-01235-w
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectEcological modellingen
dc.subjectDecision support systemen
dc.subjectVerificationen
dc.subjectModel credibilityen
dc.subjectSensitivity analysisen
dc.subjectEnvironmental managementen
dc.titleThe role of validation in optimization models for forest managementen
dc.typeJ_ČLÁNEK
dc.date.updated2024-07-03T00:03:40Z
dc.description.versionOA
local.identifier.doi10.1186/s13595-024-01235-w
local.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85192385188
local.identifier.wos001216168500001
local.number1
local.volume81
local.identifier.obd43926644
local.identifier.e-issn1297-966X
dc.project.IDGA18-08078S
dc.project.IDOptimální politiky za přítomnosti nelineárních vazeb v ekonomice smíšených lesů
dc.identifier.orcidJanová, Jitka 0000-0003-0306-8257
local.contributor.affiliationPEF


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam

CC BY 4.0
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je CC BY 4.0