Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorStředová, Hana
dc.contributor.authorFukalová, Petra
dc.contributor.authorChuchma, Filip
dc.contributor.authorHaberle, Jan
dc.contributor.authorStředa, Tomáš
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-05T00:03:25Z
dc.date.available2024-06-05T00:03:25Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697 Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozitar.mendelu.cz/xmlui/handle/20.500.12698/1904
dc.description.abstractThe positive effect of nitrogen fertilization in agriculture inevitably increases residual nitrogen losses. Water pollution led to legal restrictions of some farm practices within the framework of the Nitrates Directive of the EU. Nevertheless, even several decades later, the situation has not improved significantly. We present a possible science-based explanation of such a state and provide it to farmers and government as a support for environmental management settings. This study aimed to compare an established approach to implementing the Nitrates Directive, specifically the climate-based zoning of nitrogen fertilization restrictions using data from the mid-20th century. We evaluated this approach by juxtaposing the initial climate data with more recent data spanning from 1991 to 2020. Subsequently, we examined this zoning framework from the perspective of the non-vegetative period, characterized by temperatures below 5 oC, which is widely acknowledged as a critical threshold for nitrogen intake by plants. We found out that i) the employed climate-born zoning does not correspond to recent climate data; ii) nonvegetation period is longer than nitrogen fertilization restrictions. Therefore, despite a noteworthy 22 day reduction in the nonvegetation period from 1961/1962 to 2019/2020, we cast doubt on the notion that the period limiting nitrogen fertilizer application should also be shortened, while admitting that there are other abiotic and biotic factors affecting nitrogen behaviour within the ecosystem.en
dc.format170381
dc.publisherElsevier Science BV
dc.relation.ispartofScience of the Total Environment
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170381
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectNitrate vulnerable zonesen
dc.subjectNitrate leachingen
dc.subjectVegetation perioden
dc.subjectFertilizersen
dc.subjectSustainabilityen
dc.subjectEnvironmental quality managementen
dc.titleNitrates directive restriction: To change or not to change in terms of climate change, that is the questionen
dc.typeJ_ČLÁNEK
dc.date.updated2024-06-05T00:03:25Z
dc.description.versionOA-hybrid
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170381
local.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85183954325
local.identifier.wos001178087600001
local.number20 March
local.volume917
local.identifier.obd43926124
local.identifier.e-issn1879-1026
dc.project.IDQK22020130
dc.project.IDImplementace inovací BPEJ do systému státní správy
dc.identifier.orcidStředová, Hana 0000-0002-5551-4354
dc.identifier.orcidFukalová, Petra 0000-0002-9430-9097
dc.identifier.orcidStředa, Tomáš 0000-0001-9908-4539
local.contributor.affiliationAF


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam

CC BY 4.0
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je CC BY 4.0