Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRečková, Zuzana
dc.contributor.authorFilipčík, Radek
dc.contributor.authorSoušková, Katarína
dc.contributor.authorKopec, Tomáš
dc.contributor.authorHošek, Martin
dc.contributor.authorPešan, Vojtěch
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-24T01:02:37Z
dc.date.available2023-01-24T01:02:37Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2765-0189 Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozitar.mendelu.cz/xmlui/handle/20.500.12698/1640
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study was conducted to examine influence of skimmed milk-based extender (SM), INRA 96 extender and BotuSemen Gold extender on parameters of stallions' ejaculate during storage. Methods: In this study, 14 stallions between 4 and 20 years of age were monitored. Total and progressive motility, viability and morphology of sperm were evaluated at time intervals of 24, 48, and 72 hours after collection. Results: The total motility, progressive motility, and values of sperm with normal morphology were significantly higher in the INRA 96 and BotuSemen Gold extenders than in the SM (p<0.01). The sperm viability differed significantly in all extenders (p<0.01). The highest value of sperm viability was in INRA 96 (64.69%+-0.67%) and lowest in SM (59.70%+-0.81%). The highest differences occurred at 72 hours of storage. Values of total motility, progressive motility and sperm viability decreased over time (p<0.01). In case of sperm morphology there was no statistically significant decrease between 48- and 72-hour time intervals. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the extenders with a chemically defined composition have shown better indicators of insemination capabilities in ejaculates than the SM. The BotuSemen Gold extender is a suitable alternative to the INRA 96, when used within 48 hours; after 72 hours of storage, however, the INRA 96 showed a higher share of viable spermatozoa.en
dc.format670-676
dc.publisherAsian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Bioscience
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0300
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectFertilizing Capacityen
dc.subjectSemen Coolingen
dc.subjectSemen Extenderen
dc.subjectStallionen
dc.titleThe efficiency of different types of extenders for semen cooling in stallionsen
dc.typeJ_ČLÁNEK
dc.date.updated2023-01-24T01:02:37Z
dc.description.versionPublished Version
local.identifier.doi10.5713/ab.21.0300
local.identifier.wos000819828500004
local.number5
local.volume35
local.identifier.obd43922823
local.identifier.e-issn2765-0235
dc.project.IDAF-IGA2020-IP066
dc.project.IDAnalýza kvantitatívnych a kvalitatívnych ukazovateľov žrebčieho ejakulátu a následná prežitelnost spermií v inseminačných dávkach žrebcov pri použití rôznych druhov riedidiel
dc.identifier.orcidRečková, Zuzana 0000-0002-4863-3785
dc.identifier.orcidFilipčík, Radek 0000-0002-5376-5061
dc.identifier.orcidSoušková, Katarína 0000-0001-7305-303X
dc.identifier.orcidKopec, Tomáš 0000-0003-2446-0952
dc.identifier.orcidHošek, Martin 0000-0002-6044-8910
dc.identifier.orcidPešan, Vojtěch 0000-0001-5811-4076
local.contributor.affiliationAF


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0