An Evaluation of Two Counting Methods to Establish Rodent Densities in Crop fields

dc.contributor.authorHeroldová, Marta
dc.contributor.authorJánová, Eva
dc.contributor.authorZejda, Jan
dc.contributor.authorŠipoš, Jan
dc.contributor.authorSuchomel, Josef
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-23T02:03:29Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.date.updated2026-01-23T02:03:28Z
dc.description.abstractThe common vole (Microtus arvalis) is the main pest in agricultural areas of Central Europe. It is particularly important to monitor its numbers during spring, and if high numbers are detected, some form of pest management should be considered. In the Czech Republic, the number of active burrows is monitored using the burrow index, BI, which allows estimation of the total number of rodents, saves time and is easy to use. We aimed to assess the relationship between the burrow index and the relative abundance of the rodent species examined by snap trapping in crop fields. Bayesian MCMC algorithms with a zero-inflation model were used for this analysis. The positive relationship between BI and vole abundance occurred in the total sample of all fields and in alfalfa, winter wheat and barley crop fields. A positive relationship between BI and the abundance of the wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus), the second most common pest in the area, was only confirmed in barley, and this relationship was negative in winter rape. The positive influence of the degree of weed cover on BI was confirmed in the total sample and in winter rape and alfalfa, but weed cover has a negative effect on BI in barley and winter wheat. In contrast, weed cover did not affect the relative abundance of both rodent species in any of the sampled crops. The presence of shrubs and forests around the fields reduced BI in the whole sample, especially in alfalfa. The relative abundance of the voles was not affected by the presence of shrubs and forests around the crop. Still, a positive influence was confirmed for the abundances of mice in the whole sample and alfalfa. BI can be a reliable indicator of vole abundance in crops with high densities, but it is not very accurate at low densities and in crop fields rarely used by voles, such as sunflower and maize.en
dc.description.versionOA
dc.format397-406
dc.identifier.issn1212-2580
dc.identifier.orcidHeroldová, Marta 0000-0002-5124-975X
dc.identifier.orcidJánová, Eva 0000-0001-7069-1562
dc.identifier.orcidŠipoš, Jan 0000-0001-7814-7561
dc.identifier.orcidSuchomel, Josef 0000-0002-6455-135X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12698/2179
dc.project.IDSS06020333
dc.project.IDTlumení populačních hustot hraboše polního (Microtus arvalis) pomocí rostlinných repelentů
dc.publisherČeská akademie zemědělských věd
dc.relation.funderTA0
dc.relation.ispartofPlant Protection Science
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.17221/65/2024-PPS
dc.rightsCC BY-NC 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectcommon voleen
dc.subjectwood mouseen
dc.subjectagriculture cropsen
dc.subjectrodent abundanceen
dc.subjectburrow indexen
dc.subjectsnap trapen
dc.subjectaccuracy checkingen
dc.titleAn Evaluation of Two Counting Methods to Establish Rodent Densities in Crop fieldsen
dc.typeJ_ČLÁNEK
local.contributor.affiliationAF
local.contributor.affiliationLDF
local.identifier.doi10.17221/65/2024-PPS
local.identifier.e-issn1805-9341
local.identifier.obd43928948
local.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105021313666
local.identifier.wos001586675500001
local.number4
local.volume61

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
J-An evaluation of two counting-2025.pdf
Size:
259.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: