Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorDrimaj, Jakub
dc.contributor.authorSkoták, Vlastimil
dc.contributor.authorKamler, Jiří
dc.contributor.authorPlhal, Radim
dc.contributor.authorAdamec, Zdeněk
dc.contributor.authorMikulka, Ondřej
dc.contributor.authorJanata, Přemysl
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-31T01:03:12Z
dc.date.available2024-01-31T01:03:12Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2077-0472 Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozitar.mendelu.cz/xmlui/handle/20.500.12698/1832
dc.description.abstractHigh numbers of large ungulates are locally accompanied by high levels of damage to field crops, causing economic losses and increased costs for the protection of agricultural fields. Quantifying the levels of damage can be problematic, with the degree of accuracy depending on the method used. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy, workload and cost of four methods commonly used for estimating damage to wheat fields caused by large ungulates (esp. wild boar) in the Czech Republic. The results suggest that the manual processing of aerial photographs ("Uncrewed Aerial Systems [UAS] with Operator Delineation Method") was very laborious and the least accurate method, with a high risk of error. In comparison, the automatic evaluation of aerial images ("UAS Crop Height Method") and the "Ground-Based Assessment" both provided similar results when carefully analyzed and were equally demanding. The "Yield Method", comparing the net yield from damaged and undamaged areas, provided the same result of assessment and was the least laborious, although it does require the existence of comparable areas and for the conditions to be created in advance before the method is used. Equivalent results were achieved by the UAS Crop Height Method, which we recommend using in cases where the Yield Method cannot be applied.en
dc.format1184
dc.publisherMDPI AG (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute-MDPI)
dc.relation.ispartofAgriculture
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13061184
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectcrop yieldsen
dc.subjectwheaten
dc.subjectwildlife damageen
dc.subjectUncrewed Aerial Systemsen
dc.subjectdroneen
dc.titleComparison of Methods for Estimating Damage by Wild Ungulates on Field Cropsen
dc.typeJ_ČLÁNEK
dc.date.updated2024-01-31T01:03:12Z
dc.description.versionOA
local.identifier.doi10.3390/agriculture13061184
local.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85163890790
local.identifier.wos001013874500001
local.number6
local.volume13
local.identifier.obd43924992
local.identifier.e-issn2077-0472
dc.project.IDIGA-LDF-22-TP-006
dc.project.IDPrase divoké jako významný faktor vývoje lesních ekosystémů
dc.identifier.orcidDrimaj, Jakub 0000-0001-6363-9555
dc.identifier.orcidSkoták, Vlastimil 0000-0002-6342-4623
dc.identifier.orcidKamler, Jiří 0000-0003-0664-6956
dc.identifier.orcidPlhal, Radim 0000-0002-3964-6496
dc.identifier.orcidAdamec, Zdeněk 0000-0003-2860-2276
dc.identifier.orcidMikulka, Ondřej 0000-0002-5614-8667
local.contributor.affiliationLDF


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam

CC BY 4.0
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je CC BY 4.0