Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorSkoták, Vlastimil
dc.contributor.authorTurek, Kamil
dc.contributor.authorKamler, Jiří
dc.contributor.authorKloz, Jiří
dc.contributor.authorNovotná, Petra
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-25T01:03:01Z
dc.date.available2023-03-25T01:03:01Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1999-4907 Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozitar.mendelu.cz/xmlui/handle/20.500.12698/1668
dc.description.abstractThis study compares the amount of available biomass for wild herbivores (red deer (Cervus elaphus L.), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.), and hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas)) depending on three different types of forest silvicultural systems-presented using the example of beech and spruce stands in wintertime. During the winter period, spruce provided ten times more biomass for herbivores than beech. However, beech provided more metabolizable energy, 7.38 MJ/kg on average, whereas spruce only provided 6.57 MJ/kg. From the point of view of "risk of damage by herbivores", artificial regeneration suffered the worst damage after using the Clear Cutting method of forest regeneration, as there was the least amount of biomass available, and thus, herbivores caused the greatest damage. On average, 12% of shoots were damaged in clearings. Most at risk was young forest vegetation up to 1 m tall. In summer, the area was overgrown with available plants, but in winter, the herbivores focused mainly on eating woody shoots. Damage to the natural regeneration when using the Shelterwood Cutting and Strip Cutting regeneration methods ranged up to 3%. At the same time, a high amount of available biomass was measured there, most likely due to its frequent natural regeneration. Thus, both types of trees regenerated in this way were not as susceptible to damage by herbivores as when regenerated using the Clear Cutting method.en
dc.format825
dc.publisherMDPI AG (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute-MDPI)
dc.relation.ispartofForests
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/f12070825
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectfood supplyen
dc.subjectungulatesen
dc.subjectforest regenerationen
dc.subjectsilvicultural systemsen
dc.subjectbiomassen
dc.subjectbrowsingen
dc.titleWinter Food Availability for Wild Herbivores Depending on the Type of Forest Regenerationen
dc.typeJ_ČLÁNEK
dc.date.updated2023-03-25T01:03:01Z
dc.description.versionOA
local.identifier.doi10.3390/f12070825
local.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85109142368
local.identifier.wos000676378100001
local.number7
local.volume12
local.identifier.obd43921393
local.identifier.e-issn1999-4907
dc.identifier.orcidSkoták, Vlastimil 0000-0002-6342-4623
dc.identifier.orcidKamler, Jiří 0000-0003-0664-6956
local.contributor.affiliationLDF


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam

CC BY 4.0
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je CC BY 4.0